32 edn
|
September 26, 2002
www.edn.com
I expected that I’d be able to change the IP address
if I could get to the Actiontec configuration page. So
I disconnected the access point from my Ethernet
LAN and cycled power to both the access point and
the notebook. I assumed that, even though only the
two Actiontec products would be connected, I’d be
able to access the configuration page. It didn’t work.
I phoned Actiontec tech support and was con-
nected after a wait of only a couple of minutes. The
tech immediately stated that I had a subnet
problem, and suggested the fix I had just at-
tempted. When I told him that it hadn’t
worked, he suggested that I change the IP ad-
dress in my Linksys router to “192.168.0.200.”
The tech also admitted that the 802.11a-ac-
cess-point software was a bit immature.
NET RISKS
I was tempted to end my experiment right
there, rather than placing my 802.11b and Ethernet
networks at risk. But I figured I could always per-
form a hard reset on the Linksys product if neces-
sary to get back to the factory configuration.
Changing the IP address on the Linksys router
proved a bit trying. It took several power cycles to
the router, my desktop PC, and the Ethernet switch
in my office. I first changed the IP address but then
had no net access because the DHCP (Dynamic
Host Control Protocol) IP address server in the
router was now on the wrong subnet. After three
power cycles, I had my network back up, and I was
finally able to access the Actiontec configuration
page.
Unfortunately, there’s little you can change in the
802.11a access point via the simple menus. You can
name a network, you can enable wired-equivalent-
privacy security, and you can change the IP address.
You can handle more advanced settings only via a
clumsy command-line interface that’s not well-doc-
umented in the supplied manual. I did create a new
network name in the access point and in the client
system, but I didn’t realize any better performance.
TURBO LOCKUP
Still, I wanted to try the turbo mode, and that set-
ting was available on the configuration page. I en-
abled it and rebooted the access point. The client-
configuration utility had no explicit way to enable
turbo mode, but the status screen included a tur-
bo/nonturbo indicator. So, I assumed that the client
would automatically switch to turbo mode. After the
reboot, however, I could get no wireless connection.
According to the manual, you can depress a reset
switch for five seconds to make the access point re-
vert to factory defaults. I tried this tactic several
times to no avail. I finally went to my desktop and
was able to access the Actiontec configuration page
via an Ethernet connection. After disabling turbo
mode, I got back the wireless connection.
After my tests, I’d say that this 802.11a product
needs a lot of polish before Actiontec sells it to con-
sumers. And I don’t necessarily blame the compa-
ny. For the most part, Actiontec is selling a product
based on an Atheros reference design and software
base. It’s apparent that Atheros is new to the game.
I’d expect products based on chips from Intersil
(www.intersil.com), Agere, or other 802.11b veter-
ans to be far more polished because the 802.11a and
802.11b MACs (media-access controllers) are the
same; few software changes should be required.
Meanwhile, my experience has me wondering
whether 802.11a will ever carry video streams. I re-
cently wrote an article about the upcoming battle
between 802.11a and ultrawideband technology in
home-entertainment networks (Reference 3). In
that article, I reported that start-up Magis Networks
(www.magisnetworks.com) was relying on an
802.11a-compatible physical layer and leveraging a
proprietary MAC layer to carry video.Magis believes
that the collision-sensing MAC is the weakest link
in the 802.11a technology stack. I saw a prototype of
Magis’ system in operation.
However, I’d judge the range/bandwidth limita-
tions I just experienced to be physical-layer-relat-
ed. We’ll have to wait to see whether future revisions
of the 802.11a chips deliver on the promise of the
OFDM physical layer.
왍
References
1. Wright, Maury, “Missing Link,” CommVerge
magazine, November 2001, pg 50, www.comm
vergemag.com.
2. Wright, Maury, “Sine surfing,” CommVerge
Magazine, May 2002, pg 53, www.commvergemag.
com.
3. Wright, Maury,“On the Air,”CommVerge Mag-
azine, July 3, 2002 www.commvergemag.com.
wrks
how it
Editor at Large Maury Wright will be sticking with
plan “b” for his home network. You can reach him at
I’D JUDGE THE RANGE/BANDWIDTH LIMITATIONS I
EXPERIENCED TO BE PHYSICAL-LAYER-RELATED. WE’LL
HAVE TO WAIT TO SEE WHETHER FUTURE REVISIONS OF
THE 802.11A CHIPS DELIVER ON THE PROMISE OF THE
OFDM PHYSICAL LAYER.
Comentarios a estos manuales